Sunday, September 20, 2009

Rants on Religion - The Last Bit.

“The more you begin to investigate, what we think we understand, where we came from, what we think we are doing, the more you begin to see we have been lied to. We have been lied to by every institution. What makes you think that the religious institution is the only institution which has not been touched? The religious institutions of this world are at the bottom of the dirt. The religious institutions of this world are put there by the same people who gave you your government, your corrupt education and set up the international banking cartels, because our masters don’t give a damn about you or your family. All they care about is what they have always cared about, that is controlling the whole damn world. We have been misled away from the truth and the divine presence in the universe that men have called God. I don’t know what God is, but I know what He isn’t. And unless and until you are prepared to look at the whole truth, wherever it may go, whoever it may lead to, if you want to look the other way or if you want to play favourites, then somewhere along the line you are going to find out that you are messing with divine justice. The more you educate yourself, the more you understand where things come from, the more obvious things become, and you begin to see lies everywhere. You have to know the truth and seek the truth, and the truth will set you free.” - Z

They must find it difficult...those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority.” – G. Massey, Egyptologist.

The sad part is, we don’t find it difficult. We still live “happily” while fooling ourselves. Looking at “happy” people, I begin to doubt if it really is better to be an unsatisfied Socrates than being a satisfied fool.

“All religious systems are the fraud of the age. It serves to detach the species from the natural world and likewise each other. It supports blind submission to authority, it reduces human responsibility to the effect that God controls everything and in turn awful crimes can be justified in the name of the divine pursuit. And most importantly, it empowers those who know the truth to use the myth to manipulate and control society. The religious myth is the most powerful device ever created and serves as a psychological soil upon which other myths can flourish." - Z

Like Chomsky says, policy-makers and social-control freaks over the years have believed that because of the stupidity of the common man, he follows faith and not reason. And this naive faith requires necessary illusions and emotionally potent oversimplifications which are provided by the myth makers to keep the common man on course. Religion is one such myth, a necessary illusion which oversimplifies life. And because a highly educated society is difficult to ‘handle’ and manipulate, it is with explanations like religion with which powers that be dumb us down to later extort and run.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Rants on Religion – Of Partition

Ah, let us talk about our very own partition, the hot topic of these times. Suddenly, everyone seems to have an opinion about it. People say its Jinnah, some say Nehru and Patel, there are others who blame Gandhi and then various other permutations and combinations among these names. One of my close friends, Raj, had written about how it was just Nehru’s and Jinnah’s ego which caused the partition, he even indicated that religion was not responsible for the partition, and if at all it was, it was just another minor reason. But another Fb note, by Samvartha, put it right by saying that we should look at “what” was responsible, and not “who”.

Coming to how only certain individuals are responsible for the partition, well, a simple question, what were their strengths based on? What were their egos based on? Religion. Muslims, if not all of them, supported Jinnah because they believed in religion. We accepted Nehru’s thirst for power because we were paranoid about “them” and “their religion” and the xenophobia, which by the way, is a product of our religious brainwashing.

To understand this point, we need to look into how religious divisions came into politics in British India. My history professor Gurumurthy pointed out this part of history. In early 1900s, BG Tilak saw that religious functions and occasions is where large amounts of people gather. So, he started holding public meetings to discuss the independence of the country alongside these religious occasions. Now of course, all of these occasions were Hindu festivals like Ganesh puja etc., and Muslims would not turn up there. Further, he citied Hindu mythology and religious texts during his speeches and gave a religious colour to the independence movement. It is said that he even justified the killings of many British officials by revolutionaries on the basis of the Bhagvad Gita. BG Tilak was also among the first to cash in on the image of Shivaji and immortalise his image by giving it a superhero status (Oh, they are spending Rs.350 crores on a statue of Shivaji, tax payers money used so judiciously! How many of saw Congress-man Manish Tiwari get steamrolled for this at NDTV’s Right, Left and Centre? Nidhi Razdan, love that women!). More so, he drew comparisons between Shivaji’s war with the Muslim emperors and the war for Independence, making Muslim Emperors and consequently the Islamic population villainous. Ironically, Sangli and Mumbai are burning as you read this due to BJP-backed-riots over a poster being torn down, a poster which depicted Shivaji murdering a Muslim Emperor. It was then, around 1905, when the first feeling of isolation came about among Muslims, who felt that the independence movement was being saffronised, and rightly so. Add to that Gandhi’s overdrive of pushing religion into politics and Sarvarkar’s great philosophy called Hindutva. That was among the first cracks in our unity as a nation. And what was it based on? Religion. You can’t blame BG Tilak or Gandhi entirely for this, because they just needed some means to push their message across, but look how it has ended up decades later. We are now a bunch of religious fanatics ready to kill each other over misinterpreted, outdated books, myths and a few stones. Gandhi wanted religion to give moral authority to politics, but all religion ended up doing was enabling the immoral to gain authority in politics.

Now we all know the blah-blah about how Jinnah, Nehru and Patel were responsible for the partition. So, if we have to blame individuals, groups or their egos, who all do we blame? Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah, Patel, Sarvarkar, BG Tilak, Mountbatten, the World War, the Congress, the Hindu Maha Sabha, the Muslim League, the British... the list is endless. I choose to blame people’s irrational submission to authority. I choose to blame their ignorance which is passed off in the name of faith. I choose to blame religion. History is about studying facts and interpreting them. This is my interpretation, religion has cost us more than it has given us anything, and religion caused the Partition.

Here, I have to share one of my favorites, something I feel I can connect to.

Saints, I see
the world is mad
If I tell the truth
They rush to beat me
If I lie they trust me

Hindus claim Ram as the one
Muslims claim Rahim
Then they kill each other
Not knowing the essence

With prayer beads and caps
And brows of holy paint
They lose themselves
In sacred hymns but
Know not their own souls

Many holy men I’ve seen
Teachers of holy books
who acquire disciples
venerate graves
but know not god

The world goes on
Like this and yet
They call me mad
But Kabir says , listen,
Who’s the one Insane?

- 15th Century poet Kabir, via Ram Ke Naam, a documentary by Anand Patwardhan



contd...

Friday, September 11, 2009

Rants on Religion - 1

“I got to tell you the truth folks, I got to tell you the truth. When it comes to Bullshit, Big-time-major-league Bullshit, you have to stand in awe of the all time champion of false promises and exaggerated claims, religion. Think about it, religion has actually convinced people that there is an invisible man living in the skies, who watches everything you do, every minute of every day, and that invisible man has a special list of things he does not want you to do, and if you do any of these things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoking and burning and torture and anguish where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever and EVER till the end of TIME...!!!... But he LOVES you! He loves you. He loves you and he needs money! He always needs money! He is all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing and all-wise, but somehow, he just can’t handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes and they always need a little more. Now, you talk about a good bullshit story, HOLY SHIT.”

- via Zeitgeist, a conspiracy-theory documentary on Religion, 9/11 and Banking Cartels.

Can’t help but think for an instance, just for one instance, that we have been lied to all our lives about so many things. How can we refuse the possibility, just the possibility, that after all religion could just be a way to control society, an ancient PR technique to conquest people psychologically and has nothing, nothing to do with God? Even Descartes, perhaps among the first modern philosophers to justify the existence of God, gives importance to thinking. Think. How can we even refuse to Think?

And while we talk about Money and God, just ONE of the Ganesh Pandals in Mumbai has managed to “raise” Rs. 5 crores, apart from the gold, silver and other articles donated. These materials will also be auctioned soon, and all the money will be used for “charity”. Charity, yeah right. Never in my life will I forget that the person with the biggest tond (belly) I have seen in that priest at Tirupati standing beside the idol. All that money given for “charity”, sure it feeds his overzealous appetite for ghee-ful, buttery, rich diet of top class food and pays for all the gold he adorns. Not to mention how the money also fills up the coffers of every person, from the peons at the temple to the CM of the state. And just as you read this, we are witnessing the possibility of many police officers of Gujarat being convicted for shooting down youngsters just because they “fit” their idea of Islamist terrorists.

It is disappointing, and appalling, as to how so many lives are foolishly based on a farce. The French, who think religious thinking obstructs freedom of thought, are now facing a backlash from the Sikhs asking to be able practise their religion freely. The situation is complicated, why should any government curb my freedom to do anything I want as far as I don’t harm anyone? Surely, wearing a turban does not harm anyone, I shall have the right to wear it. But is this just about wearing a turban, or about the much bigger issue of how a social malaise like religion can hamper an entire society? The French have fought hard for keeping the church out of their state and public lives, will they take it easy if a small minority from a different country try to change that? Is it that French know that religion, as a concept, is poison for a public sphere?

Like many other aspects of our society, to put in Chomsky’s words, religion is a way of building up irrational attitudes to submission of authority. It is senseless jingoism and can push us into accepting inhumane triumphalism in war over religion, caste or country or any other institution created only for people to be divided and ruled over. Like Robert G. Ingersoll says, Religion can never reform mankind because religion is slavery.

Let us say we don’t have the balls to accept that religion, by concept, is a moron. What about religion in practice?


contd...

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Micro blogging is easier…

…but 140 words on Twitter is still too short for me. So here goes…

On BJP,

Life goes full circle. From liking it to due to the brainwashing by the typically conservative (read pathetic, insecure and xenophobic) Brahminical mentality, to developing a phobia for them due to their hardliner (also read conservative :P) policies, I now understand their importance in Indian politics. Not really strong at the moment, but their opposition is required. In many ways, of what I understand, Congress was responsible for the political emergence of right-wing parties, because they went too far ahead with their plundering. Congress is the godfather (or should I say mother?) of divide and rule politics in India. So they need someone to worry about. Like one professor i met in UQ said, BJP's stint was historically important for India, to make everyone hear what they think and how some people think.

On Gandhi,

My newfound realization that he was responsible for bringing in religion into politics at this level, forces me, with glee, to hold him responsible for the sick communal forces of the country. My disrespect for him, which was largely childish and uninformed, has transformed into careless disregard. Don’t think he deserves a road in every city, the demigod status and unquestioned popularity.

On Jaswant,

Poor man, chooses to speak what he thinks is the truth, BJP kicks him out calling him a bad politician and Congress calls him an irresponsible historian, among other things. Personally, very happy for him, slapped both the parties hard with one book. He got high book sales in return, good for him.

On Kaminey,

I am actually very surprised as to how it is raking in decent profits. I really don’t believe normal paisa-vasool audiences can like this movie. But if indeed it is raking in money, and getting great reviews and user ratings, times are changing. Like I have mentioned here earlier, a film should be three things, an entertainer (for the money, especially), a medium with social messages and an art. While it scores full marks for art and a social message, keeping in mind it is a commercial movie, the viewers are polarized into liking it or hating it as an entertainer. Its complex filmmaking, experimental and has good social messages attached, loved the “Jai Maharashtra” thing, also the AIDS-awareness song. One of my friends suggested it was pseudo-intellectual, and he hated that. Well I don’t know, personally, loved it. Bolo Dhan Te NAaaaan! Hats off to Vishal Bhradwaj, we need such filmmakers. Waiting for Ishqiya (Chutiyum Sulphate….. HAHAHAHAH!!!! )

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Not Just Racism

I turned to self-publishing as I could not find a mainstream publisher for it. OR may be I did not try hard enough, but whatever! Here it is. Some additions to suit my blog :P


The Indian mainstream media has openly declared Australia racist. Accusations of the country being unsafe, inhuman and unfair to it’s immigrants and international students are being hurled across throughout the nation. Opinion makers and the revered columnists of the country have also taken this opportunity to sling some mud at the education system in India. While all this is happening, it is perhaps time for us to hear the whole story from those who do not agree with the way this issue has been hyped up. The attacks on Indian students are much more complicated than just “racism”.

No one denies racism exists in Australia. Liam is an Irish construction worker here and is patient but firm when he says, "Australia is the most racist country I have seen in the world, and if I was given a dollar every time I have been asked to go home, I would be a millionaire now."

Sam Owen, a native of the Sunshine Coast studying at the University of Queensland opens up easily, “Australia is pretty racist mate! The media, the sports and our politics, we show it everywhere. But all of us are not like that, and the issue is different when it comes to attacks.” He is talking about online communities like “F*** On, We’re Empty”, which encourages Australians to accept other cultures migrating in, as opposed to hate-filled communities like “F*** off! We’re Full”. Moreover, while a lot of Indians did get beat up during the past few months, there were numerous incidents of white Australians being stabbed and mugged as well.

A famous Indian news website carried a story quoting statistics on how the number of attacks and robbery on Indians in Australia has gone up from 1083 to 1447 in the last one year. What they conveniently forgot to mention was that there have been more than 176,400 registered assault cases alone in Australia in 2007, up by more than 4000 cases since the previous year. It is evident that the statistics meant nothing in comparison to the overall situation and were just being thrown around to serve media's sensationalist attitude towards important issues. However, it is true that Indians are easier targets in a country where the crime is high anyway, as Liam says "Indians are visibly different and are defenseless and scared in a foreign country!"

Ramya and Deepak Kumar, a young family living in Melbourne since 2003, also have some other issues in mind. “We do believe some of the recent incidents have more to do with alcohol and drug abuse by the youth, than being racist in nature.” What they further say, and many others agree, is that while there are many instances of racism on the streets and the public transport, these attacks are not just because of racism.

For any new immigrant, it is very easy to assume that the culture here is rather nasty. “The culture makes you think that Aussies are brash and aggressive. They talk like that, they ask you frank, rude questions and they are harsh in their ways sometimes. But for them it is pretty normal. That is their culture and they still respect everyone.” says Gurtaj Singh Atwal, who was born and brought up in Australia. He sports a turban and a beard and plays cricket every weekend, typically Indian as he puts it, and he has been asked rude questions about his beard and turban, but disagrees that it is racism, it is just a misunderstanding of the culture on both sides, he says.

Some of these "curry bashings" are also due to ignorance. "They can’t easily differentiate between Fiji Indians, Malays, Singaporeans, Sri Lankans and Indians. We all look alike and our names don’t sound very different. We get classified in a broad group and type-casted.” says Rajesh*, who migrated 16 years ago and is now a respected member of the community in Melbourne. The type-casting is based on jobs and courses also. “Many Indian students here come for a hospitality course, and a taxi job. People are very surprised to hear if you come from a different faculty of studies.” says Shyam Mohan, a student at the Queensland University of Technology. So even if a few people of this wide demographic misbehave, the entire community is looked at as annoyingly inferior. Indians are victims of that misunderstanding. "I would say they are wrong, but no, they aren’t racist." adds Shyam.

But the burden of this misunderstanding falls heavily on the Indian camp. By and large, Indians have been known to form their own communities based on their religion or language and not mingle with the locals more than what is absolutely necessary. Shyam openly accepts it, “Most Indians here do remain in their communities, as they rarely hang out with Australian friends, and this itself projects a negative attitude towards the local people. They don’t get to know us properly.” Achuth Menon, who has lived in Brisbane for 12 years, has an instant example of what some think about India, “The other day my Aussie barber showed me a picture of an Indian barber shop – a guy sitting outdoors next to a banyan tree and cutting someone’s hair.” But Shyam quickly adds “We are the ones who have come here, we should go out and mingle, right?”

Achuth and Gurtaj also believe that students who study at the Universities and later settle here tend to do better than those who are placed here directly by job agencies. They have the advantage of knowing the Australian culture through their college lives. Also, people who come here in a mid-career stage for higher positions also do well. Nonetheless, the students who land here are definitely not completely equipped to face the culture and adopt it. “Indian students are far ahead academically, but on the social front – etiquettes, behaviour, language, etc., they need to be better.” says Rajesh*.

Videos of the supposed police atrocities on Indian protesters in Melbourne were rife in the media, but the news anchors chose to ignore the fact that the police had accepted the demands of the protesters and acknowledged their anger, and had requested them to move out of the roads to give way to the peak hour traffic. It was when they refused to budge, like they would in India, that they were subject to coercion.

The Kumars, Shyam, Achuth, and Rakesh strongly believe that some suburbs in Melbourne, Sydney and even Brisbane are indeed very dangerous and unsafe. But the reason is not racism alone. The roots lie in our education system, our misconceptions about the west and the Australian society and a misunderstanding between the people of both countries. As for the mainstream Indian media, the Kumars say it well, “More they call Aussies racists, more they will put all the Indians living here at risk. We should stand shoulder to shoulder with Australians and tackle the violence and not distract the efforts by putting a racism spin to it.”



*Name changed on request for anonymity.

The writer is a student at the Manipal Institute of Communication, Manipal and is presently on exchange with the University of Queensland, Brisbane.